6/10
Baseball is the sport to follow if you love numbers. Almost every aspect of the game can be and is
quantified by a percentage which both ball clubs and fans use to rank
players. The science of ranking players
using particular categories, specifically on base percentage, is the foundation
for an analysis program known as sabermetrics.
Moneyball never uses this term, but that is what they are talking
about.
Moneyball tells the story of the Oakland Athletics’ 2002
season. At the end of 2001, the A’s lost
the divisional playoff series to the Yankees and then their three superstars
left for free agency. Compared to the
Yankees and the vast majority of the rest of Major League Baseball teams, the
Oakland A’s were poor. They could not
compete with the other clubs to put well known impact players on their roster. General Manager Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) pleaded with his scouts to
come up with a new way to identify players instead of the usual way it had been
done for the past hundred years or so, mostly gut instinct and the usual power
numbers.
While in Cleveland on a bartering trip to replace the holes
in his lineup, Billy meets Peter Brand (Jonah
Hill), a low level player analyst, who has some unconventional ideas about
what it really takes to win games. To
win games, you have to produce runs. To
produce runs, you have to get on base, be it with hits or walks. Scouts and baseball crowds prefer hits since
they are far more sexy than walks; however, they are one in the same to Peter
Brand and Billy Beane quickly becomes an acolyte to this new way of thinking. Shifting focus to the most undervalued
players in baseball, Oakland starts signing guys who are considered too old,
sub-par fielders, and unimpressive at the plate. Not only does the scouting staff start to
revolt, but the coach, Art Howe (Philip
Seymour Hoffman) looks at Billy and his methods like they are from Mars.
Sabermetrics was not new in 2002, but no ball club ever put
a team together using mostly stats before.
Everybody expected them to lose, be at the cellar of their division, and
for Billy to be fired at the end of the season.
However, the 2002 season went in a different direction and produced some
profound ripple effects throughout the rest of the league and how teams valued
players afterwards. Moneyball is
definitely a film for baseball fans and stat geeks. However, if you are not into baseball, you
most likely will not enjoy Moneyball very much.
There is limited on field action and a lot of detailed conversations
about baseball methods with its corresponding jargon.
Moneyball is based on a 2004 book and is advertised as the
true story of what happened in that 2002 season; however, there are a lot of
dramatizations and changes. First of
all, there is no Peter Brand in real life.
In fact, Billy’s Assistant General Manager joined the team in 1999 and
was named Paul DePodesta. Mr. DePodesta
did not like how they wrote his character in the script and asked that his name
be changed. He argues that he was not
only focused on statistics to shape the team.
I desperately wanted Moneyball to be an amazing film. I love baseball and I really enjoy reading
and talking about baseball stats.
Unfortunately, Moneyball is not a great movie, it is just ok. It lacks a certain weight and depth. Early scenes between Pitt and Hill could have
been much deeper concerning their ideas to change the way the game is played,
but they are light and choppy. Peter
Brand never really gets a long monologue to explain just how his ideas could
create a winning team from start to finish.
Furthermore, the character of Coach Howe is ridiculous. Philip Seymour Hoffman spends his very
limited screen time hurling out one word guttural answers and just looks
ill. I know he was meant to disagree
with the way the team was headed, but why make him look deathly pale and on the
verge of a nervous breakdown?
See Moneyball if you are a baseball fan; you will enjoy the
behind the scenes look at the scouting meetings and the shenanigans which go on
at the trade deadline. However, be
prepared for a light fiction film which can stray pretty far from what really
happened that year.
No comments:
Post a Comment